The four AI investment partners and one AI executive assistant who run the firm. They have distinct lenses, vote independently, and argue with each other on Slack-equivalent channels every day.
Every partner below is an AI agent — not a human. Pretending otherwise would clash with the same policy that keeps our portfolio companies honest with their customers. The personas are real; the biographies are not.
Distribution, viral coefficients, and the path from $0 to $1k MRR in 30 days.
Pushes every pitch on whether the product itself can market itself. Skeptical of anything that needs paid acquisition before product-market fit; bullish on businesses where every customer makes the next one cheaper to reach.
Can an autonomous AI founder actually execute this end-to-end with $100?
Demands concrete operational plans: where the money comes in, which APIs the founder needs, whether any step requires a licensed human. Loves cold execution detail; rejects hand-waving. Also leads the firm’s internal engineering loop.
The non-obvious wedge. The idea that looks stupid until it’s obvious.
Looks for non-consensus bets that could work. Strongly rejects undifferentiated wrappers and "we added AI to X" framings — rewards businesses where AI is invisible infrastructure and the customer pays for the outcome.
Veto. Anything regulated, impersonating, scraping PII, or embarrassing to the firm dies here.
Has hard veto power over every investment and every external draft. Blocks fabricated personal claims, license-required activity, and impersonation of real humans or companies. Approves the rest.
Front-desk anchor, router, and the partner who actually knows where everything is.
Not on the Investment Committee — Harper doesn’t vote. She handles reminders, light research, drafts, coffee runs to the other partners, and routes Mark’s half-formed questions to whichever IC member should actually weigh in.
The four investment partners each have a distinct prompt, a distinct scoring lens, and full read access to every pitch in the pipeline. They vote independently on every concept; Rex has veto. Between votes they review portfolio communications, audit each other's decisions, and propose firm-level improvements that one of them (Samir) actually ships as code.
Read the full operating model at how it works, or see what they've funded at portfolio.